Food additives are specialized chemicals intentionally added to foods, intended to remain in the product at the time of consumption. Both international organizations and national governments evaluate the safety of food additives to ensure their compatibility with agricultural food systems.
The assessment considers local food supply chains and cultural differences in dietary habits that may influence additive intake.
Food additive intake assessment serves three primary objectives:
- Monitoring chemical intake and comparing it to acceptable daily intake (ADI) values.
- Identifying consumer groups at risk of exceeding or approaching ADI values.
- Providing data to regulatory bodies for reassessing food additive regulations in cases of high intake among all or specific consumer groups.
The overarching goal of intake assessment is to safeguard consumer health while supporting the development of food additive regulations aligned with agricultural production.
Framework for Food Additive Intake Assessment in Agriculture
Safety evaluation of food additives relies on assessing the toxicity of chemicals added to food. The purpose of intake assessment is to determine the likelihood and extent to which ADI values may be exceeded.
The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) value, established by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), represents an estimate of the amount of a food additive, expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested over a lifetime without significant health risk (WHO, 1987).
Read Also: Bird of Paradise Flower (Strelitzia reginae): All You Need To Know About
Scope and Objectives of Food Additive Intake Assessment
The assessment establishes limits on food additive intake and outlines goals for evaluation procedures. Multiple approaches can be employed, grouping food additives based on their toxicological classification (as shown in Table 1 below).
It is critical to evaluate the use of specific components, whether additives or ingredients, and define the safety data required for each purpose. This forms the foundation for intake assessment and risk evaluation procedures.
Food additives are specialized chemicals intentionally added to foods, intended to remain in the product at the time of consumption.
Both international organizations and national governments evaluate the safety of food additives to ensure their compatibility with agricultural food systems. The assessment considers local food supply chains and cultural differences in dietary habits that may influence additive intake.
Food additive intake assessment serves three primary objectives:
- Monitoring chemical intake and comparing it to acceptable daily intake (ADI) values.
- Identifying consumer groups at risk of exceeding or approaching ADI values.
- Providing data to regulatory bodies for reassessing food additive regulations in cases of high intake among all or specific consumer groups.
The overarching goal of intake assessment is to safeguard consumer health while supporting the development of food additive regulations aligned with agricultural production.
Read Also: General Management Considerations in Livestock Management
Food Additive Safety Evaluation
Safety evaluation of food additives relies on assessing the toxicity of chemicals added to food. The purpose of intake assessment is to determine the likelihood and extent to which ADI values may be exceeded.
The Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) value, established by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), represents an estimate of the amount of a food additive, expressed on a body weight basis, that can be ingested over a lifetime without significant health risk (WHO, 1987).
The assessment establishes limits on food additive intake and outlines goals for evaluation procedures. Multiple approaches can be employed, grouping food additives based on their toxicological classification (as shown in Table 1 below).
It is critical to evaluate the use of specific components, whether additives or ingredients, and define the safety data required for each purpose. This forms the foundation for intake assessment and risk evaluation procedures.
Toxicological Classification of Food Additives
| Group | Description |
|---|---|
| A | Substances with an established ADI value |
| B | Substances generally regarded as safe |
| C | Substances with inadequate data |
| D | Flavoring components |
| E | Natural components used as additives without scientific safety data or with very limited data |
Regulation of Maximum Levels of Food Additives
In the United States, the concept of certain food components being generally recognized as safe (GRAS) was established in early legislation and later rigorously defined to include scientific evidence. Additional regulations are outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations for specific food additives.
In the European Union, three major directives govern food additive use in member countries. Australia and New Zealand adopt a similar regulatory approach to Europe.
In Japan, regulations differentiate between natural and chemical additives, with stricter oversight for the latter, typically based on JECFA’s ADI values established since 1956. The ADI value provides an estimate of safe daily ingestion levels for normal consumers.
Nigerian Regulatory Framework for Food Safety in Agriculture
In Nigeria, key legislation governing food safety includes:
- The Public Health Laws, 1917, now known as Public Health Ordinance Cap 164 of 1958.
- The Food and Drugs Decree, No. 35 of 1974.
- The Standards Organizations of Nigeria (SON) Decree, No. 56 of 1971.
- The Animal Disease Control Decree, No. 10 of 1988.
- The Marketing of Breast Milk Substitute Decree, No. 41 of 1990.
- The National Agency for Food and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC) Decree No. 15 of 1993.
Challenges of Food Safety in Agricultural Supply Chains
Health issues from unsafe food in Nigeria often stem from contamination by naturally occurring toxicants, microbiological contaminants, chemical additives exceeding permitted levels, pesticide and veterinary residues, or toxins from food processing.
Naturally occurring toxicants originate from plants and animals, while bacterial contamination (Salmonella, Clostridium, Campylobacter, Escherichia) and fungal toxins (mycotoxins) contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality. Mycotoxins exacerbate endemic diseases like malaria and hepatitis.
Key Regulatory Bodies in Nigeria for Agricultural Food Safety
1. Federal Ministry of Health: Formulates national policies, guidelines, and regulations on food hygiene, monitors implementation, establishes nutritive value standards, oversees food environments, controls foodborne diseases, and ensures public water quality.
2. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Promotes good agricultural practices and technologies aligned with food safety standards.
3. National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC): Regulates and controls the manufacture, importation, exportation, distribution, and sale of food, drugs, and bottled water.
4. Standards Organization of Nigeria (SON): Formulates standards for food composition and maintains over 100 standards and codes of hygienic practices, periodically reviewed to reflect technological advancements.
5. States and Local Governments: Collaborate with the National Primary Healthcare Development Agency to monitor street food vending, catering, and traditional markets.
6. National Codex Committee (NCC): Established in 1973 and reconstituted in 2002, coordinates Nigeria’s participation in the Codex Alimentarius Commission, ensuring food safety, consumer health, and fair trade practices. The NCC operates under a procedural manual, with the Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON) as its secretariat and Codex Contact Point (CCP).
7. Codex Contact Point (CCP): Coordinates Codex activities, facilitating communication with the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
8. NCC Technical Committees: Four committees synthesize national positions on Codex texts, preparing delegations for Codex meetings.
NAFDAC’s Regulatory Strategies for Agricultural Products
1. Product Registration: Employs a systematic process involving documentation, labeling, inspection, and approval to assign NAFDAC Registration Numbers, ensuring safety and quality.
2. Consultative Meetings: Encourages sectoral groups (e.g., Association of Food, Beverage and Tobacco Employers, All Farmers Association) to self-regulate and engage with NAFDAC.
3. Public Enlightenment Campaigns: Uses media and grassroots campaigns to educate rural communities on food safety.
4. Training and Publications: Conducts capacity-building programs and collaborates with international bodies like USFDA, USDA, IAEA, and WHO.
Challenges in Regulating Foodborne Toxicants in Agriculture
Challenges include variability in raw material quality, contamination risks from multiple handlers, inadequate infrastructure, limited laboratory capacity, insufficient regulatory officers, poor coordination along the value chain, and inadequate knowledge among food handlers.
Unwholesome practices, such as improper agrochemical use and poor storage of crops like melon seeds and groundnuts, lead to mycotoxin production. Street-vended foods, prepared in unhygienic conditions, pose microbiological risks.
Solutions for Enhanced Food Safety in Agriculture
Addressing these challenges requires public enlightenment, improved coordination along the food supply chain, capacity building, enhanced infrastructure, and training for producers and regulators. Equipping stakeholders with necessary tools and knowledge is essential.
Ensuring Compliance with Food Safety Laws
Food laws incorporate minimum quality requirements to prevent adulteration and fraudulent practices. These laws cover the entire supply chain, from on-farm controls to final distribution, ensuring safe consumption.
Do you have any questions, suggestions, or contributions? If so, please feel free to use the comment box below to share your thoughts. We also encourage you to kindly share this information with others who might benefit from it. Since we can’t reach everyone at once, we truly appreciate your help in spreading the word. Thank you so much for your support and for sharing!